Liberal-Welfarist Law Of Nations A History Of International Law at Meripustak

Liberal-Welfarist Law Of Nations A History Of International Law

Books from same Author: Emmanuelle Jouannet And Christopher Sutcliffe 

Books from same Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Related Category: Author List / Publisher List


  • Retail Price: ₹ 11670/- [ 5.00% off ]

    Seller Price: ₹ 11087

Sold By: T K Pandey      Click for Bulk Order

Offer 1: Get ₹ 111 extra discount on minimum ₹ 500 [Use Code: Bharat]

Offer 2: Get 5.00 % + Flat ₹ 100 discount on shopping of ₹ 1500 [Use Code: IND100]

Offer 3: Get 5.00 % + Flat ₹ 300 discount on shopping of ₹ 5000 [Use Code: MPSTK300]

Free Shipping (for orders above ₹ 499) *T&C apply.

In Stock

Free Shipping Available



Click for International Orders
  • Provide Fastest Delivery

  • 100% Original Guaranteed
  • General Information  
    Author(s)Emmanuelle Jouannet And Christopher Sutcliffe 
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    ISBN9781107018945
    Pages326
    BindingHardcover
    LanguageEnglish
    Publish YearJanuary 2012

    Description

    Cambridge University Press Liberal-Welfarist Law Of Nations A History Of International Law by Emmanuelle Jouannet And Christopher Sutcliffe 

    Although portrayed as a liberal law of co-existence of and co-operation between states, international law has always been a welfarist law, too. Emerging in eighteenth-century Europe, it soon won favour globally. Not only did it minister to the interests of states and their concern for stability, but it was also an interventionist law designed to ensure the happiness and well-being of peoples. Hence international law initially served as a secularised eschatological model, replacing the role of religion in ensuring the proper ordering of mankind, which was held to be both one and divided. That initial vision still drives our post-Cold War globalised world. Contemporary international law is neither a strictly welfarist law nor a strictly liberal law, but is in fact a liberal-welfarist law. In the conjunction of these two purposes lies one of the keys to its meaning and a partial explanation for its continuing ambivalence.