International Status in the Shadow of Empire Nauru and Histiories of International Law at Meripustak

International Status in the Shadow of Empire Nauru and Histiories of International Law

Books from same Author: Cait Storr

Books from same Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Related Category: Author List / Publisher List


  • Retail Price: ₹ 11670/- [ 9.00% off ]

    Seller Price: ₹ 10620

Sold By: T K Pandey      Click for Bulk Order

Offer 1: Get ₹ 111 extra discount on minimum ₹ 500 [Use Code: Bharat]

Offer 2: Get 9.00 % + Flat ₹ 100 discount on shopping of ₹ 1500 [Use Code: IND100]

Offer 3: Get 9.00 % + Flat ₹ 300 discount on shopping of ₹ 5000 [Use Code: MPSTK300]

Free Shipping (for orders above ₹ 499) *T&C apply.

In Stock

Free Shipping Available



Click for International Orders
  • Provide Fastest Delivery

  • 100% Original Guaranteed
  • General Information  
    Author(s)Cait Storr
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    ISBN9781108498500
    Pages318
    BindingHardcover
    LanguageEnglish
    Publish YearDecember 2020

    Description

    Cambridge University Press International Status in the Shadow of Empire Nauru and Histiories of International Law by Cait Storr

    Nauru is often figured as an anomaly in the international order. This book offers a new account of Nauru's imperial history and examines its significance to the histories of international law. Drawing on theories of jurisdiction and bureaucracy, it reconstructs four shifts in Nauru's status – from German protectorate, to League of Nations C Mandate, to UN Trust Territory, to sovereign state – as a means of redescribing the transition from the nineteenth century imperial order to the twentieth century state system. The book argues that as international status shifts, imperial form accretes: as Nauru's status shifted, what occurred at the local level was a gradual process of bureaucratisation. Two conclusions emerge from this argument. The first is that imperial administration in Nauru produced the Republic's post-independence 'failures'. The second is that international recognition of sovereign status is best understood as marking a beginning, not an end, of the process of decolonisation.