Democracy Dialogue and Environmental Disputes The Contested Languages of Social Regulationsocial at Meripustak

Democracy Dialogue and Environmental Disputes The Contested Languages of Social Regulationsocial

Books from same Author: Bruce A Williams and Albert R Matheny

Books from same Publisher: Yale University Press

Related Category: Author List / Publisher List


  • Retail Price: ₹ 1984/- [ 5.00% off ]

    Seller Price: ₹ 1885

Sold By: T K Pandey      Click for Bulk Order

Offer 1: Get ₹ 111 extra discount on minimum ₹ 500 [Use Code: Bharat]

Offer 2: Get 5.00 % + Flat ₹ 100 discount on shopping of ₹ 1500 [Use Code: IND100]

Offer 3: Get 5.00 % + Flat ₹ 300 discount on shopping of ₹ 5000 [Use Code: MPSTK300]

Free Shipping (for orders above ₹ 499) *T&C apply.

In Stock

Free Shipping Available



Click for International Orders
  • Provide Fastest Delivery

  • 100% Original Guaranteed
  • General Information  
    Author(s)Bruce A Williams and Albert R Matheny
    PublisherYale University Press
    ISBN9780300075540
    Pages272
    BindingSoftcover
    LanguageEnglish
    Publish YearMay 1998

    Description

    Yale University Press Democracy Dialogue and Environmental Disputes The Contested Languages of Social Regulationsocial by Bruce A Williams and Albert R Matheny

    At every level of government, environmental regulation is under siege. In Washington, it has been attacked first through the "New Federalism" and now through the "Contract with America." Outside the capital, environmental regulation is the subject of controversy as state and local officials struggle with new responsibilities, threats of industry exit, and challenges from grassroots groups._x000D__x000D_This book addresses the conundrum of regulation by tracing its source to the competing characterizations of regulatory legitimacy that have accompanied the growth of the American state. Bruce Williams and Albert Matheny identify three distinct languages-managerial, pluralist, and communitarian-used to articulate competing visions of regulation. They argue that each language posits a different understanding of the public interest and therefore a different relationship between the state, the market, and the public. Because all three languages are invoked in regulatory debates, disputants talk past one another, leaving fundamental issues of legitimacy and democracy unresolved or masked by unexamined assumptions. The authors propose a dialogic model for analyzing regulatory policymaking, drawing on postmodernist theory that claims that establishing single languages for understanding the world inevitably distorts communication. They then apply their analysis to case studies of actual environmental disputes over hazardous waste regulation in the 1980s and 1990s in New Jersey, Ohio, and Florida._x000D_show more