Adjudicating Trade and Inestment Disputes at Meripustak

Adjudicating Trade and Inestment Disputes


  • Retail Price: ₹ 11670/- [ 9.00% off ]

    Seller Price: ₹ 10620

Sold By: T K Pandey      Click for Bulk Order

Offer 1: Get ₹ 111 extra discount on minimum ₹ 500 [Use Code: Bharat]

Offer 2: Get 9.00 % + Flat ₹ 100 discount on shopping of ₹ 1500 [Use Code: IND100]

Offer 3: Get 9.00 % + Flat ₹ 300 discount on shopping of ₹ 5000 [Use Code: MPSTK300]

Free Shipping (for orders above ₹ 499) *T&C apply.

In Stock

Free Shipping Available



Click for International Orders
  • Provide Fastest Delivery

  • 100% Original Guaranteed
  • General Information  
    Author(s) Szilard Gaspar- Szilagyi and Daniel Behn and Malcolm Langford
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    ISBN9781108487405
    Pages320
    BindingHardcover
    LanguageEnglish
    Publish YearJuly 2020

    Description

    Cambridge University Press Adjudicating Trade and Inestment Disputes by Szilard Gaspar- Szilagyi and Daniel Behn and Malcolm Langford

    Recent trends suggest that international economic law may be witnessing a renaissance of convergence – both parallel and intersectional. The adjudicative process also reveals signs of convergence. These diverse claims of convergence are of legal, empirical and normative interest. Yet, convergence discourse also warrants scepticism. This volume contributes to both the general debate on the fragmentation of international law and the narrower discourse concerning the interplay between international trade and investment, focusing on dispute settlement. It moves beyond broad observations or singular case studies to provide an informed and wide-reaching assessment by investigating multiple standards, processes, mechanisms and behaviours. Methodologically, a normative stance is largely eschewed in favour of a range of 'doctrinal,' quantitative and qualitative methods that are used to address the research questions. Furthermore, in determining the extent of convergence or divergence, it is important to recognize that there is no bright line or clear yardstick for determining its nature or degree.